Understanding Ordinary, Special and Unanimous Resolutions in Victorian Owners Corporations

Strata Advisory
This article has been fact-checked by our lawyers team

Table Of Contents

Share this Article:
Key Takeaways:

Resolution Rules

Resolution Rules: When “Ordinary” Isn’t Enough. What Every Lot Owner in Victoria Needs to Know

Decisions in a Victorian owners corporation (OC) are not all created equal.

Some matters, like approving the annual budget, can usually be decided by a simple majority. Others, like changing the rules, borrowing significant sums or raising large special levies, require a much higher level of agreement from lot owners.

The Owners Corporations Act 2006 (Vic) (the Act) sets out three main types of resolutions: ordinary, special and unanimous. Each has different voting thresholds and is used for different types of decisions. Getting the type of resolution wrong can put the validity of levies and decisions at risk.

This article explains, in plain language, what each type of resolution means and why it matters for every lot owner.

What is a Resolution?

What is a Resolution?

A resolution is a formal decision of the owners corporation, made either:

  • at a general meeting (including an annual general meeting); or
  • by ballot conducted outside a meeting.

The committee can also make decisions, but it does so under powers delegated by the OC. The thresholds below (ordinary, special, unanimous) come from the Act and apply to decisions of the OC itself; many of those powers can then be delegated to the committee for day-to-day management.

Most decisions of an OC are made by ordinary resolution. Only certain, more significant matters need a special resolution or unanimous resolution.

The Types of Resolutions

The Types of Resolutions

The Ordinary Resolution: For Routine Decision

An ordinary resolution is the default type of resolution.

It is passed if a simple majority of votes cast at the meeting (or returned in a ballot) are in favour.

By default, each lot has one vote, whether the vote is taken at a meeting or by ballot.

For ordinary resolutions, any matter that does not specifically require a special or unanimous resolution under the Act is decided this way.

Special Resolutions – When the Stakes are Higher

A special resolution requires a much higher level of support:

It is passed if 75% of votes are in favour:

  • 75% of total lot entitlements if a ballot or poll is taken; or
  • 75% of total votes for all lots in any other case.

Interim special resolutions (ISR)

Sometimes a special resolution doesn’t quite reach the 75% threshold. In that case, it may still pass as an interim special resolution if:

  • at least 50% of total votes (or lot entitlements) are in favour; and
  • no more than 25% are against.

If an ISR is passed:

  1. The OC must send notice of the interim special resolution to all lot owners within 14 days of the meeting or close of ballot;
  2. The notice must state that the ISR will become a full special resolution after 29 days, unless lot owners holding more than 25% of the total votes petition the secretary against it within that 29-day period.

If there is no qualifying petition, the ISR automatically becomes a special resolution at the end of the 29 days.

Unanimous Resolutions – for Fundamental Changes

A unanimous resolution is the highest level of agreement:

It requires 100% support, either:

  • all lot entitlements if a ballot or poll is taken; or
  • all votes for all lots in any other case.

Unanimous resolutions are reserved for decisions that fundamentally change property rights or the structure of the OC.

Why the Right Type of Resolution Matters

Why the Right Type of Resolution Matters

Using the wrong type of resolution,  for example, approving a major special levy by ordinary resolution when the Act requires a special resolution, can have serious consequences.

If a resolution is not passed in accordance with the Act:

  • it can be challenged by lot owners, including at VCAT;
  • levies or decisions may be declared invalid or set aside;
  • the OC can face significant administrative and financial burden, including refunding levies and re-issuing compliant resolutions and fee notices.

For lot owners, understanding resolution types is essential to:

  • identify when a proposal is being put forward with the correct threshold; and
  • know when you may have grounds to question or challenge a decision.

—END—

This article was first published on 1 December 2025. It was written by Julia Moroz and Molly McCarthy from our Melbourne office.

© Bugden Allen Group Legal Pty Ltd. This is general information only and not legal advice. You should not rely on this information without seeking legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances.

Julia Moroz

Director & Principal

Julia Moroz is a Director & Principal at Bugden Allen who advises owners corporations, strata communities, insurers and property stakeholders on building defects, defect recovery and complex property disputes.

Julia has developed a particular focus on helping owners corporations navigate major building defect issues, from initial investigations and expert reports through to dispute resolution, litigation, and recovery of rectification costs. She is regularly engaged to advise on technically complex and high-value matters involving developers, builders, consultants, certifiers, engineers, and insurers.

Her practice combines deep expertise in property litigation, strata law and insurance-related disputes, enabling her to deliver practical, strategic, and commercially focused advice to clients facing significant building and infrastructure issues. She is particularly experienced in advising on waterproofing failures, façade and cladding issues, fire safety defects, structural defects, professional negligence claims, and multi-party recovery actions.

Julia understands the significant financial, operational and governance challenges that building defects can create for owners corporations and property stakeholders. She works closely with committees, strata managers, experts and insurers to develop effective recovery strategies, manage risk and achieve efficient resolution of disputes. Her focus is on delivering practical outcomes that protect her clients’ interests, whether through negotiation, alternative dispute resolution, or litigation.

Working across Australia, Julia is recognised for her ability to manage complex disputes involving multiple parties and competing interests while maintaining a clear focus on commercial outcomes and successful building rectification projects.

Julia’s experience includes advising on:

  • building defects affecting residential, mixed-use, and commercial developments
  • waterproofing, façade, structural and fire safety defects
  • recovery claims against builders, developers, certifiers, architects, and engineers
  • professional negligence claims involving construction professionals
  • insurance disputes arising from defective building work
  • owners corporation litigation and dispute resolution
  • recovery of rectification costs arising from defective design and construction
  • multi-party recovery and contribution proceedings
  • common property defect claims and building rectification projects
  • alternative dispute resolution, litigation and negotiated settlements of defect-related disputes
Julia Moroz

Julia Moroz

Partner

Julia Moroz is a Director & Principal at Bugden Allen who advises owners corporations, strata communities, insurers and property stakeholders on building defects, defect recovery and complex property disputes. Julia has developed a particular focus on helping owners corporations navigate major building defect issues, from initial investigations and expert reports...

View profile of Julia Moroz
Written by Julia Moroz
Director & Principal

Julia Moroz is a Director & Principal at Bugden Allen who advises owners corporations, strata communities, insurers and property stakeholders on building defects, defect recovery and complex property disputes.

Julia has developed a particular focus on helping owners corporations navigate major building defect issues, from initial investigations and expert reports through to dispute resolution, litigation, and recovery of rectification costs. She is regularly engaged to advise on technically complex and high-value matters involving developers, builders, consultants, certifiers, engineers, and insurers.

Her practice combines deep expertise in property litigation, strata law and insurance-related disputes, enabling her to deliver practical, strategic, and commercially focused advice to clients facing significant building and infrastructure issues. She is particularly experienced in advising on waterproofing failures, façade and cladding issues, fire safety defects, structural defects, professional negligence claims, and multi-party recovery actions.

Julia understands the significant financial, operational and governance challenges that building defects can create for owners corporations and property stakeholders. She works closely with committees, strata managers, experts and insurers to develop effective recovery strategies, manage risk and achieve efficient resolution of disputes. Her focus is on delivering practical outcomes that protect her clients’ interests, whether through negotiation, alternative dispute resolution, or litigation.

Working across Australia, Julia is recognised for her ability to manage complex disputes involving multiple parties and competing interests while maintaining a clear focus on commercial outcomes and successful building rectification projects.

Julia’s experience includes advising on:

  • building defects affecting residential, mixed-use, and commercial developments
  • waterproofing, façade, structural and fire safety defects
  • recovery claims against builders, developers, certifiers, architects, and engineers
  • professional negligence claims involving construction professionals
  • insurance disputes arising from defective building work
  • owners corporation litigation and dispute resolution
  • recovery of rectification costs arising from defective design and construction
  • multi-party recovery and contribution proceedings
  • common property defect claims and building rectification projects
  • alternative dispute resolution, litigation and negotiated settlements of defect-related disputes
Julia Moroz
Written by Julia Moroz Partner

Julia Moroz is a Director & Principal at Bugden Allen who advises owners corporations, strata communities, insurers and property stakeholders on building defects, defect recovery and...

ONLINE ENQUIRY

Contact us to arrange a consult with one of our team members.

Related Articles

Legislative Reform, Victoria

28/06/2026

Financial Hardship Reform: Protecting Vulnerable Owners or Creating New Risks for Owners Corporations

Western Australia

25/08/2026

What actually happens when a strata dispute goes to SAT?

Meetings, Western Australia

07/08/2026

Serving notices on owners and occupiers under the Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA) – practical tips for strata managers

Locations

Our Locations Across Australia