When Can an Owners Corporation Commence Bankruptcy Proceedings for Unpaid Levies?

Levy Recovery Solutions
This article has been fact-checked by our lawyers team

Table Of Contents

Share this Article:
Key Takeaways:
Unpaid levies place real pressure on an owners corporation. While many arrears are resolved through reminders or standard debt-collection steps, some situations escalate to the point where more serious enforcement action must be considered. One of the most significant options is bankruptcy, a powerful legal mechanism available when an individual lot owner owes a debt of at least $10,000.Bankruptcy should never be the first step. But understanding when, why and how an owners corporation may reach this stage helps committees make informed and lawful decisions.

Why Levy Recovery Matters

Why Levy Recovery Matters

Owners corporations depend entirely on levies to fund essential services: insurance, maintenance, repairs, utilities, contract services and long-term capital works. When one owner stops paying, the shortfall is carried by everyone else. Persistent arrears can delay repairs, push up levies for compliant owners, and cause tension within the scheme.

Most owners corporations follow the usual sequence: reminder notices, interest charges, payment plans, debt-collection letters and, if necessary, application to VCAT or a court for judgment. Bankruptcy comes into play only when a judgment remains unpaid and other enforcement options have failed.

When Bankruptcy Becomes an Option

When Bankruptcy Becomes an Option

Bankruptcy is available only against individuals and only when the unpaid debt is $10,000 or more. The debt must also be the subject of a final order or judgment. This means an owners corporation cannot simply “declare” someone bankrupt; it must first obtain judgment for the unpaid levies.

Once an order or judgment exists and remains unpaid, the owners corporation may serve a Bankruptcy Notice on the debtor. If the owner fails to comply with that notice within the required time (usually 21 days), that failure becomes an “act of bankruptcy”. The owners corporation can then file a Creditor’s Petition in the Federal Circuit and Family Court seeking a sequestration order, which is the formal declaration of bankruptcy.

What Happens if the Debtor is a Company?

What Happens if the Debtor is a Company?

If the debtor is a company, the creditor may apply to the Federal Court of Australia for an order that the company be wound up in insolvency under section 459P of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).

The most common basis for such an application is the company’s failure to comply with a statutory demand issued under section 459E. If the company does not comply with the demand within the prescribed 21-day period, the company is presumed to be insolvent. The creditor who issued the demand is then entitled to rely on that statutory presumption as the foundation of their winding-up application. The presumption is rebuttable if the company can produce evidence to the contrary.

If the Court ultimately orders that the company be wound up, it will appoint a registered liquidator to take control of the company’s affairs and administer the liquidation.

Is Bankruptcy Appropriate for Levy Recovery?

Is Bankruptcy Appropriate for Levy Recovery?

While bankruptcy can be effective, it is a serious step with long-lasting consequences for the lot owner. Bankruptcy can lead to:

  • appointment of a trustee;
  • investigation of finances; and/or
  • potential sale of assets, including the lot itself.

For the owners corporation, bankruptcy can achieve what standard debt recovery cannot: it can ultimately lead to realisation of the owner’s equity in the property to satisfy levy arrears. However, it also carries risks, especially if the owner has limited assets, if there are multiple secured creditors, or if the arrears are relatively small compared to legal costs.

Committees must therefore consider whether the action is proportionate, whether the owner can realistically pay, and whether bankruptcy is likely to produce a better outcome than other enforcement measures such as garnishee orders or charging orders.

Authority to Commence Proceedings

Authority to Commence Proceedings

Before commencing any legal action, including bankruptcy and winding up in insolvency, an owners corporation must ensure it has the correct authorisation under the Owners Corporations Act. Generally, levy recovery proceedings fall within the monetary jurisdiction that allows ordinary resolution approval. However, if the matter moves into more complex or higher-court territory, or involves non-monetary relief, the owners corporation should get legal advice on whether a special resolution is required. Sound governance at the outset prevents challenges later.

—END—

This article was first published on 1 December 2025. It was written by Julia Moroz,  Special Counsel and Brodie Dyer, Solicitor of our Melbourne office and Petra Lohmann, General Manager at LevyCollect.

© Bugden Allen Group Legal Pty Ltd. This is general information only and not legal advice. You should not rely on this information without seeking legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances.

Julia Moroz

Director & Principal

Julia Moroz is a Director & Principal at Bugden Allen who advises owners corporations, strata communities, insurers and property stakeholders on building defects, defect recovery and complex property disputes.

Julia has developed a particular focus on helping owners corporations navigate major building defect issues, from initial investigations and expert reports through to dispute resolution, litigation, and recovery of rectification costs. She is regularly engaged to advise on technically complex and high-value matters involving developers, builders, consultants, certifiers, engineers, and insurers.

Her practice combines deep expertise in property litigation, strata law and insurance-related disputes, enabling her to deliver practical, strategic, and commercially focused advice to clients facing significant building and infrastructure issues. She is particularly experienced in advising on waterproofing failures, façade and cladding issues, fire safety defects, structural defects, professional negligence claims, and multi-party recovery actions.

Julia understands the significant financial, operational and governance challenges that building defects can create for owners corporations and property stakeholders. She works closely with committees, strata managers, experts and insurers to develop effective recovery strategies, manage risk and achieve efficient resolution of disputes. Her focus is on delivering practical outcomes that protect her clients’ interests, whether through negotiation, alternative dispute resolution, or litigation.

Working across Australia, Julia is recognised for her ability to manage complex disputes involving multiple parties and competing interests while maintaining a clear focus on commercial outcomes and successful building rectification projects.

Julia’s experience includes advising on:

  • building defects affecting residential, mixed-use, and commercial developments
  • waterproofing, façade, structural and fire safety defects
  • recovery claims against builders, developers, certifiers, architects, and engineers
  • professional negligence claims involving construction professionals
  • insurance disputes arising from defective building work
  • owners corporation litigation and dispute resolution
  • recovery of rectification costs arising from defective design and construction
  • multi-party recovery and contribution proceedings
  • common property defect claims and building rectification projects
  • alternative dispute resolution, litigation and negotiated settlements of defect-related disputes
Julia Moroz

Julia Moroz

Partner

Julia Moroz is a Director & Principal at Bugden Allen who advises owners corporations, strata communities, insurers and property stakeholders on building defects, defect recovery and complex property disputes. Julia has developed a particular focus on helping owners corporations navigate major building defect issues, from initial investigations and expert reports...

View profile of Julia Moroz
Written by Julia Moroz
Director & Principal

Julia Moroz is a Director & Principal at Bugden Allen who advises owners corporations, strata communities, insurers and property stakeholders on building defects, defect recovery and complex property disputes.

Julia has developed a particular focus on helping owners corporations navigate major building defect issues, from initial investigations and expert reports through to dispute resolution, litigation, and recovery of rectification costs. She is regularly engaged to advise on technically complex and high-value matters involving developers, builders, consultants, certifiers, engineers, and insurers.

Her practice combines deep expertise in property litigation, strata law and insurance-related disputes, enabling her to deliver practical, strategic, and commercially focused advice to clients facing significant building and infrastructure issues. She is particularly experienced in advising on waterproofing failures, façade and cladding issues, fire safety defects, structural defects, professional negligence claims, and multi-party recovery actions.

Julia understands the significant financial, operational and governance challenges that building defects can create for owners corporations and property stakeholders. She works closely with committees, strata managers, experts and insurers to develop effective recovery strategies, manage risk and achieve efficient resolution of disputes. Her focus is on delivering practical outcomes that protect her clients’ interests, whether through negotiation, alternative dispute resolution, or litigation.

Working across Australia, Julia is recognised for her ability to manage complex disputes involving multiple parties and competing interests while maintaining a clear focus on commercial outcomes and successful building rectification projects.

Julia’s experience includes advising on:

  • building defects affecting residential, mixed-use, and commercial developments
  • waterproofing, façade, structural and fire safety defects
  • recovery claims against builders, developers, certifiers, architects, and engineers
  • professional negligence claims involving construction professionals
  • insurance disputes arising from defective building work
  • owners corporation litigation and dispute resolution
  • recovery of rectification costs arising from defective design and construction
  • multi-party recovery and contribution proceedings
  • common property defect claims and building rectification projects
  • alternative dispute resolution, litigation and negotiated settlements of defect-related disputes
Julia Moroz
Written by Julia Moroz Partner

Julia Moroz is a Director & Principal at Bugden Allen who advises owners corporations, strata communities, insurers and property stakeholders on building defects, defect recovery and...

ONLINE ENQUIRY

Contact us to arrange a consult with one of our team members.

Related Articles

Case Law, Western Australia

17/08/2026

Can you make an adverse possession claim over a neighbouring strata lot in WA?

Meetings, Queensland

02/09/2026

Nuisance in the Third Space

Case Law, Western Australia

22/07/2026

Shutting down discussions between lot owners at general meetings – a breach of the Strata Titles Act 1985 (WA)?

Locations

Our Locations Across Australia